30963 shaares
3 résultats
taggé
Ryzen5
"Sometimes we have the feeling that the manufacturers want to artificially distance it from the Intel models."
ton pc portable
en Ryzen
une bonne machine tout de même GPU 2-3fois plus perf
mais autonomie moins importante 5.5 au lieu de 8h
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Beware-Lenovo-ThinkPad-E485-might-be-equipped-with-a-much-darker-FHD-screen.415982.0.html
ton pc portable
en Ryzen
une bonne machine tout de même GPU 2-3fois plus perf
mais autonomie moins importante 5.5 au lieu de 8h
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Beware-Lenovo-ThinkPad-E485-might-be-equipped-with-a-much-darker-FHD-screen.415982.0.html
les deux processeurs sont des bases en Quad-Cores + CMT pour un total de 8 Threads.
Le Ryzen 5 2600H proposerait une vitesse de base de 3.3 GHz et embarquerait une puce VEGA 8 disposant donc de 512 SP, alors que le Ryzen 7 2800H fonctionnerait lui à 3.4 GHz de base et embarquerait une puce VEGA 10 donc en 640 SP.
(donc + 1ghz par rapport aux modèles U)
Le Ryzen 5 2600H proposerait une vitesse de base de 3.3 GHz et embarquerait une puce VEGA 8 disposant donc de 512 SP, alors que le Ryzen 7 2800H fonctionnerait lui à 3.4 GHz de base et embarquerait une puce VEGA 10 donc en 640 SP.
(donc + 1ghz par rapport aux modèles U)
Pros
+
CPU performance is similar to i5-8250U, i7-8550U
+
cheaper than an Intel Kaby Lake-R alternative
+
faster GPU performance than Iris Pro Graphics
+
steady CPU performance; no throttling
+
larger battery than 2016 model
+
attractive narrow bezel design
+
strong base; relatively rigid lid
+
strong performance-per-Watt
+
USB Type-C Gen. 1
Cons
-
dropped RJ-45 port and one less USB Type-A port than 2016 model
-
poorer-than-expected graphics performance when gaming
-
pulse-width modulation if not on maximum brightness
-
slight creaking; not as strong as the Spectre x360 15
-
slower 2x2 WLAN performance than Intel equivalent
-
poor outdoor visibility; display could be brighter
-
frequent system crashes; poor display drivers
-
system fan always active; frequent pulsing
-
slow system performance; primary HDD
-
narrow color gamut; inaccurate colors
-
no Thunderbolt 3 or DisplayPort
-
trackpad could be firmer
-
difficult serviceability
+
CPU performance is similar to i5-8250U, i7-8550U
+
cheaper than an Intel Kaby Lake-R alternative
+
faster GPU performance than Iris Pro Graphics
+
steady CPU performance; no throttling
+
larger battery than 2016 model
+
attractive narrow bezel design
+
strong base; relatively rigid lid
+
strong performance-per-Watt
+
USB Type-C Gen. 1
Cons
-
dropped RJ-45 port and one less USB Type-A port than 2016 model
-
poorer-than-expected graphics performance when gaming
-
pulse-width modulation if not on maximum brightness
-
slight creaking; not as strong as the Spectre x360 15
-
slower 2x2 WLAN performance than Intel equivalent
-
poor outdoor visibility; display could be brighter
-
frequent system crashes; poor display drivers
-
system fan always active; frequent pulsing
-
slow system performance; primary HDD
-
narrow color gamut; inaccurate colors
-
no Thunderbolt 3 or DisplayPort
-
trackpad could be firmer
-
difficult serviceability