30870 shaares
316 résultats
taggé
processeur
il semble au top
consomme bc moins
coté CPU
https://www.notebookcheck.com/AMD-Zen-5-Strix-Point-CPU-Analyse-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370-gegen-Intel-Core-Ultra-Apple-M3-und-Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite.866997.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ProArt-PX13-review-The-world-s-fastest-13-3-inch-2-in-1-thanks-to-AMD-Zen-5-and-RTX-4070-laptop.868429.0.html#toc-5
coté iGPU
The new Radeon 890M offers more performance than the old Radeon 780M—
but it also requires a lot of power to reach its full potential. With TDP values below 30 watts, its advantage is usually only around 10 %.
consomme bc moins
coté CPU
https://www.notebookcheck.com/AMD-Zen-5-Strix-Point-CPU-Analyse-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370-gegen-Intel-Core-Ultra-Apple-M3-und-Qualcomm-Snapdragon-X-Elite.866997.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ProArt-PX13-review-The-world-s-fastest-13-3-inch-2-in-1-thanks-to-AMD-Zen-5-and-RTX-4070-laptop.868429.0.html#toc-5
coté iGPU
The new Radeon 890M offers more performance than the old Radeon 780M—
but it also requires a lot of power to reach its full potential. With TDP values below 30 watts, its advantage is usually only around 10 %.
Intel unwraps Lunar Lake architecture: Up to 68% IPC gain for E-cores, 16% IPC gain for P-Cores
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-unwraps-lunar-lake-architecture-up-to-68-ipc-gain-for-e-cores-16-ipc-gain-for-p-cores
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2024-06/intel-lunar-lake-computex-2024/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-unwraps-lunar-lake-architecture-up-to-68-ipc-gain-for-e-cores-16-ipc-gain-for-p-cores
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2024-06/intel-lunar-lake-computex-2024/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
les gains de performances moyens dépassent les 15 %
https://www.anandtech.com/show/21399/arm-unveils-2024-cpu-core-designs-cortex-x925-a725-and-a520-arm-v9-2-redefined-for-3nm-
Cortex A925 + 36 % de perf en plus par rapport au Cortex-X4
"In the ISO comparison with the same clock speed and the same memory conditions, the Cortex-X925 and Cortex-X4 show an incidence of around 15 percent each with light deviations in the three application examples Geekbench 6.2, the speed of app starts and Speedometer 2, which were specifically selected by Arm top and bottom. However, this is not a general gain, but rather the result of selection by Arm."
Cortex A925 + 36 % de perf en plus par rapport au Cortex-X4
"In the ISO comparison with the same clock speed and the same memory conditions, the Cortex-X925 and Cortex-X4 show an incidence of around 15 percent each with light deviations in the three application examples Geekbench 6.2, the speed of app starts and Speedometer 2, which were specifically selected by Arm top and bottom. However, this is not a general gain, but rather the result of selection by Arm."
à part de l'IA c'est tout pareil qu'un 704x ...
https://www.tomshardware.fr/test-processeur-amd-ryzen-7950-x3d-gaming-jeux-cpu/
"Avec son Ryzen 9 7950X3D, AMD parvient à reprendre la place de processeur le plus puissant en jeu, coiffant sur le poteau un Core i9-13900K pourtant déjà très bon.
Intel possède bien un 13900KS plus rapide (...] : vendu plusieurs dizaines d’euros plus cher que le 7950X3D, il reste légèrement moins performant que ce dernier. "
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-02/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is not only very fast, but also very energy efficient. What the Ryzen 9 7950X still needed an average of 105 watts for in the test, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D only needs 72 watts - with better performance at the same time. The Core i9-13900K even has 141 watts, the KS model 147 watts. Here the new AMD processor delivers twice as many FPS per watt - that's impressive
le 8coeurs a été simulé (avec CCD désactivé) et il est encore plus efficace :
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/ryzen-7800x3d-performance-preview/
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-chipset-drivers-feature-special-game-optimizations-for-ryzen-9-7000x3d-cpus
"Avec son Ryzen 9 7950X3D, AMD parvient à reprendre la place de processeur le plus puissant en jeu, coiffant sur le poteau un Core i9-13900K pourtant déjà très bon.
Intel possède bien un 13900KS plus rapide (...] : vendu plusieurs dizaines d’euros plus cher que le 7950X3D, il reste légèrement moins performant que ce dernier. "
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-02/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is not only very fast, but also very energy efficient. What the Ryzen 9 7950X still needed an average of 105 watts for in the test, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D only needs 72 watts - with better performance at the same time. The Core i9-13900K even has 141 watts, the KS model 147 watts. Here the new AMD processor delivers twice as many FPS per watt - that's impressive
le 8coeurs a été simulé (avec CCD désactivé) et il est encore plus efficace :
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/ryzen-7800x3d-performance-preview/
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-chipset-drivers-feature-special-game-optimizations-for-ryzen-9-7000x3d-cpus
ça serait excellent et il reprendrait le lead en jeu
jusqu'à (8+16) sur les HX et 157w en turbo !!! (55w de base)
jusqu'à 10 coeurs sur les modèles U (2+8/12 thread)
jusqu'à 10 coeurs sur les modèles U (2+8/12 thread)
présentation :
https://www.tomshardware.fr/amd-devoile-ses-processeurs-epyc-9004-jusqua-96-coeurs-zen-4/
performance dingue de la nouvelle plateforme serveur d'AMD en 96coeurs :
"https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9654-9554-benchmarks/15
"The 64-core EPYC 9554 2P was 64% faster than the 64-core EPYC 7763 2P configuration overall,
or 67% if running the EPYC 9554 2Ps in the power determinism mode.
(...)The AMD EPYC 9654 2P was running at over 2x the speed of Intel's current flagship, the Xeon Scalable 8380 2P "Ice Lake" processors.
"the generational gains from Milan(X) to Genoa were some of the most captivating generational improvements and against the competition that I've seen out of the past 18+ years of running Phoronix for Linux hardware reviews"
autre tests :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-4th-gen-epyc-genoa-9654-9554-and-9374f-review-96-cores-zen-4-and-5nm-disrupt-the-data-center
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-genoa-gaps-intel-xeon-in-stunning-fashion/
reste à voir face aux nouveaux CPU intel Sapphire Rapids en 60 coeurs
un Htop avec 356 Thread lol ! :
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AMD-EPYC-9654-2P-384-Thread-HTOP-100-percent.jpg
"In a 24x DDR5 server, it is not uncommon to see memory using well over 100W, or ~10% of system power." lol
AMD's EPYC 9004 "Genoa" Reference Board Runs The Open-Source OpenBMC (c'est une solution openSource pour "manager" les serveurs avec des firmwares openSource)
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-genoa-openbmc
AMD Epyc 9004 highlights
N5 at TSMC
Zen 4 architecture
16 to 96 processor cores and 192 threads
12 channel memory interface
Up to 6TB DDR5-4800
128 PCIe lanes Gen5 for single socket
160 PCIe lanes Gen5 for dual socket
64 CLX lanes
+ 14% IPC*
https://www.tomshardware.fr/amd-devoile-ses-processeurs-epyc-9004-jusqua-96-coeurs-zen-4/
performance dingue de la nouvelle plateforme serveur d'AMD en 96coeurs :
"https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9654-9554-benchmarks/15
"The 64-core EPYC 9554 2P was 64% faster than the 64-core EPYC 7763 2P configuration overall,
or 67% if running the EPYC 9554 2Ps in the power determinism mode.
(...)The AMD EPYC 9654 2P was running at over 2x the speed of Intel's current flagship, the Xeon Scalable 8380 2P "Ice Lake" processors.
"the generational gains from Milan(X) to Genoa were some of the most captivating generational improvements and against the competition that I've seen out of the past 18+ years of running Phoronix for Linux hardware reviews"
autre tests :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-4th-gen-epyc-genoa-9654-9554-and-9374f-review-96-cores-zen-4-and-5nm-disrupt-the-data-center
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-genoa-gaps-intel-xeon-in-stunning-fashion/
reste à voir face aux nouveaux CPU intel Sapphire Rapids en 60 coeurs
un Htop avec 356 Thread lol ! :
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AMD-EPYC-9654-2P-384-Thread-HTOP-100-percent.jpg
"In a 24x DDR5 server, it is not uncommon to see memory using well over 100W, or ~10% of system power." lol
AMD's EPYC 9004 "Genoa" Reference Board Runs The Open-Source OpenBMC (c'est une solution openSource pour "manager" les serveurs avec des firmwares openSource)
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-genoa-openbmc
AMD Epyc 9004 highlights
N5 at TSMC
Zen 4 architecture
16 to 96 processor cores and 192 threads
12 channel memory interface
Up to 6TB DDR5-4800
128 PCIe lanes Gen5 for single socket
160 PCIe lanes Gen5 for dual socket
64 CLX lanes
+ 14% IPC*
Intel Raptor Lake in the test: Core i9-13900K, i7-13700K & i5-13600K chase Ryzen 7000 - ComputerBase
https://videocardz.com/140948/intel-13th-gen-core-raptor-lake-desktop-cpu-review-roundup
https://www.tomshardware.fr/test-intel-core-raptor-lake-processeur-gen13-performances-13900k-13600k/
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46770-test-intel-core-i9-13900k-core-i7-13700k-core-i5-13600k-et-z790.html
une vrai concurrence, au niveau en applicatif et meilleur en jeux (jusqu'à +15%) que les Ryzen 7000
https://www.tomshardware.fr/test-intel-core-raptor-lake-processeur-gen13-performances-13900k-13600k/
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46770-test-intel-core-i9-13900k-core-i7-13700k-core-i5-13600k-et-z790.html
une vrai concurrence, au niveau en applicatif et meilleur en jeux (jusqu'à +15%) que les Ryzen 7000
Présentation d'Intel :
les allégations d’intel avec des gains annoncés de 15 % en monocœur et 41 % en multicœur.
Coté gaming et sur un panel de jeux sélectionnés, le fondeur annonce jusqu’à 24 % de gain face à la génération précédente.
Rumeur de bench devant le nouveau 7950x :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83373/le-intel-core-i9-13900ks-deja-benche-sous-cpu-z-et-il-est-bien-plus-rapide-que-la-13900k.html
les allégations d’intel avec des gains annoncés de 15 % en monocœur et 41 % en multicœur.
Coté gaming et sur un panel de jeux sélectionnés, le fondeur annonce jusqu’à 24 % de gain face à la génération précédente.
Rumeur de bench devant le nouveau 7950x :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83373/le-intel-core-i9-13900ks-deja-benche-sous-cpu-z-et-il-est-bien-plus-rapide-que-la-13900k.html
concaténation de 25 tests :
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/xs88ck/amd_ryzen_7000_meta_review_25_launch_reviews/
ça consomme beaucoup par défaut, mais ça arrache et ça reste plus efficient
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17585/amd-zen-4-ryzen-9-7950x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-review-retaking-the-high-end :
Final Words: Zen 4 is now King, Long Live the King
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/amd-ryzen-7950x-7900x-7700x-7600x-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
The Ryzen 9 7950X is even faster in multi-core applications with a maximum of 88 watts than the Ryzen 9 5950X with 142 watts and with 65 watts even faster than the Core i9-12900K with 241 watts.
With 45 watts, the Ryzen 7 7700X clearly beats the Ryzen 9 6900HS for notebooks, which is trimmed for efficiency and also has 45 watts. This gives hope for extremely efficient, extremely fast Ryzen 7000 Mobile.
In multi-core loads, the 16-zen quad-core processor speeds up and away. Intel's CPUs don't stand a chance, even the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X with 32 Zen 3 cores is just missed
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-7-7700x-gaming-benchmark-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Grace à la fréquence nettement plus élevée, le gap est très intéressant, (clock to clock c'est +12% en multicpu)
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46620-test-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-a-7-7700x-zen-4-am5-x670e-a-ddr5.html
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-realise-un-tour-de-force-brulant-en-5-nm-et-offre-des-cpu-tres-rapides-a192281.html
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-7900x-7950x-linux
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (sans ventirad) : 849.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (sans ventirad) : 669.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (sans ventirad) : 489.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (sans ventirad) : 369.00 €
pour les cartes mères :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83359/cartes-meres-amd-x670-les-tarifs-et-la-disponibilite-en-france.html
ça pique mais il faut attendre les B650
la dif entre chipset :
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-10/chipsaetze-ryzen-7000-amd-x670e-x670-b650e-b650-vergleich/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/xs88ck/amd_ryzen_7000_meta_review_25_launch_reviews/
ça consomme beaucoup par défaut, mais ça arrache et ça reste plus efficient
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17585/amd-zen-4-ryzen-9-7950x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-review-retaking-the-high-end :
Final Words: Zen 4 is now King, Long Live the King
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/amd-ryzen-7950x-7900x-7700x-7600x-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
The Ryzen 9 7950X is even faster in multi-core applications with a maximum of 88 watts than the Ryzen 9 5950X with 142 watts and with 65 watts even faster than the Core i9-12900K with 241 watts.
With 45 watts, the Ryzen 7 7700X clearly beats the Ryzen 9 6900HS for notebooks, which is trimmed for efficiency and also has 45 watts. This gives hope for extremely efficient, extremely fast Ryzen 7000 Mobile.
In multi-core loads, the 16-zen quad-core processor speeds up and away. Intel's CPUs don't stand a chance, even the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X with 32 Zen 3 cores is just missed
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-7-7700x-gaming-benchmark-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Grace à la fréquence nettement plus élevée, le gap est très intéressant, (clock to clock c'est +12% en multicpu)
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46620-test-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-a-7-7700x-zen-4-am5-x670e-a-ddr5.html
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-realise-un-tour-de-force-brulant-en-5-nm-et-offre-des-cpu-tres-rapides-a192281.html
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-7900x-7950x-linux
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (sans ventirad) : 849.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (sans ventirad) : 669.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (sans ventirad) : 489.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (sans ventirad) : 369.00 €
pour les cartes mères :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83359/cartes-meres-amd-x670-les-tarifs-et-la-disponibilite-en-france.html
ça pique mais il faut attendre les B650
la dif entre chipset :
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-10/chipsaetze-ryzen-7000-amd-x670e-x670-b650e-b650-vergleich/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/81492/asrock-devoile-4-premiere-cartes-meres-x670-pour-les-cpu-amd-ryzen-7000.html
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/81527/on-fait-un-premier-tour-des-cartes-meres-gigabyte-x670-qui-seront-proposees-entre-300-et-500-dollars.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17400/amd-announces-mendocino-apu-6nm-mainstream-mobile-zen-2-laptop-chip-coming-in-q4
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/81527/on-fait-un-premier-tour-des-cartes-meres-gigabyte-x670-qui-seront-proposees-entre-300-et-500-dollars.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17400/amd-announces-mendocino-apu-6nm-mainstream-mobile-zen-2-laptop-chip-coming-in-q4
quelle entube !!!
mais il est moins cher en allemagne ou espagne
ah si rue du commerce 499 :
https://www.rueducommerce.fr/p-ryzen-7-5800x-3d-3445-ghz-amd-3382132-18381.html
mais il est moins cher en allemagne ou espagne
ah si rue du commerce 499 :
https://www.rueducommerce.fr/p-ryzen-7-5800x-3d-3445-ghz-amd-3382132-18381.html
420€ le dernier 12 coeurs ! pas mal
et 580€ le dernier 16 coeurs ! :
https://www.dealabs.com/bons-plans/processeur-amd-ryzen-9-5950x-2337282
et 580€ le dernier 16 coeurs ! :
https://www.dealabs.com/bons-plans/processeur-amd-ryzen-9-5950x-2337282
96 cœurs Zen 4 gravés en 5 nm.
12 canaux
12 canaux