30652 shaares
759 résultats
taggé
amd
Ah ...
Initial Verdict: AMD has the best mobile processor
https://www.tomshardware.fr/test-processeur-amd-ryzen-7950-x3d-gaming-jeux-cpu/
"Avec son Ryzen 9 7950X3D, AMD parvient à reprendre la place de processeur le plus puissant en jeu, coiffant sur le poteau un Core i9-13900K pourtant déjà très bon.
Intel possède bien un 13900KS plus rapide (...] : vendu plusieurs dizaines d’euros plus cher que le 7950X3D, il reste légèrement moins performant que ce dernier. "
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-02/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is not only very fast, but also very energy efficient. What the Ryzen 9 7950X still needed an average of 105 watts for in the test, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D only needs 72 watts - with better performance at the same time. The Core i9-13900K even has 141 watts, the KS model 147 watts. Here the new AMD processor delivers twice as many FPS per watt - that's impressive
le 8coeurs a été simulé (avec CCD désactivé) et il est encore plus efficace :
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/ryzen-7800x3d-performance-preview/
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-chipset-drivers-feature-special-game-optimizations-for-ryzen-9-7000x3d-cpus
"Avec son Ryzen 9 7950X3D, AMD parvient à reprendre la place de processeur le plus puissant en jeu, coiffant sur le poteau un Core i9-13900K pourtant déjà très bon.
Intel possède bien un 13900KS plus rapide (...] : vendu plusieurs dizaines d’euros plus cher que le 7950X3D, il reste légèrement moins performant que ce dernier. "
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-02/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is not only very fast, but also very energy efficient. What the Ryzen 9 7950X still needed an average of 105 watts for in the test, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D only needs 72 watts - with better performance at the same time. The Core i9-13900K even has 141 watts, the KS model 147 watts. Here the new AMD processor delivers twice as many FPS per watt - that's impressive
le 8coeurs a été simulé (avec CCD désactivé) et il est encore plus efficace :
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/ryzen-7800x3d-performance-preview/
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-chipset-drivers-feature-special-game-optimizations-for-ryzen-9-7000x3d-cpus
ça serait excellent et il reprendrait le lead en jeu
https://www.tomshardware.fr/le-ryzen-9-7845hx-trone-en-tete-du-classement-multicoeurs-passmark-des-cpu-mobiles/
reste à voir face aux 13th gen
reste à voir face aux 13th gen
Pas beaucoup moins perf
ça consomme pas beaucoup moins non plus
mais c'est moins cher
https://videocardz.com/147338/amd-ryzen-7900-7700-7600-non-x-desktop-cpu-review-roundup
ça consomme pas beaucoup moins non plus
mais c'est moins cher
https://videocardz.com/147338/amd-ryzen-7900-7700-7600-non-x-desktop-cpu-review-roundup
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx/
Pas trop mal assez bonne carte 200$ moins chère que la RTX4080
Et presque au niveau en RayTracing(-20%)
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-12/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-xt-review-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Pas trop mal assez bonne carte 200$ moins chère que la RTX4080
Et presque au niveau en RayTracing(-20%)
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-12/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-xt-review-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
- Ryzen 9 7950X - 699 dollars à 574 dollars dont - 18%
- Ryzen 9 7900X - 549 dollars à 474 dollars dont - 14%
- Ryzen 7 7700X - 399 dollars à 349 dollars dont - 13%
- Ryzen 5 7600X - 299 dollars à 249 dollars dont - 17%
déjà des baisses
- Ryzen 9 7900X - 549 dollars à 474 dollars dont - 14%
- Ryzen 7 7700X - 399 dollars à 349 dollars dont - 13%
- Ryzen 5 7600X - 299 dollars à 249 dollars dont - 17%
déjà des baisses
présentation :
https://www.tomshardware.fr/amd-devoile-ses-processeurs-epyc-9004-jusqua-96-coeurs-zen-4/
performance dingue de la nouvelle plateforme serveur d'AMD en 96coeurs :
"https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9654-9554-benchmarks/15
"The 64-core EPYC 9554 2P was 64% faster than the 64-core EPYC 7763 2P configuration overall,
or 67% if running the EPYC 9554 2Ps in the power determinism mode.
(...)The AMD EPYC 9654 2P was running at over 2x the speed of Intel's current flagship, the Xeon Scalable 8380 2P "Ice Lake" processors.
"the generational gains from Milan(X) to Genoa were some of the most captivating generational improvements and against the competition that I've seen out of the past 18+ years of running Phoronix for Linux hardware reviews"
autre tests :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-4th-gen-epyc-genoa-9654-9554-and-9374f-review-96-cores-zen-4-and-5nm-disrupt-the-data-center
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-genoa-gaps-intel-xeon-in-stunning-fashion/
reste à voir face aux nouveaux CPU intel Sapphire Rapids en 60 coeurs
un Htop avec 356 Thread lol ! :
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AMD-EPYC-9654-2P-384-Thread-HTOP-100-percent.jpg
"In a 24x DDR5 server, it is not uncommon to see memory using well over 100W, or ~10% of system power." lol
AMD's EPYC 9004 "Genoa" Reference Board Runs The Open-Source OpenBMC (c'est une solution openSource pour "manager" les serveurs avec des firmwares openSource)
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-genoa-openbmc
AMD Epyc 9004 highlights
N5 at TSMC
Zen 4 architecture
16 to 96 processor cores and 192 threads
12 channel memory interface
Up to 6TB DDR5-4800
128 PCIe lanes Gen5 for single socket
160 PCIe lanes Gen5 for dual socket
64 CLX lanes
+ 14% IPC*
https://www.tomshardware.fr/amd-devoile-ses-processeurs-epyc-9004-jusqua-96-coeurs-zen-4/
performance dingue de la nouvelle plateforme serveur d'AMD en 96coeurs :
"https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9654-9554-benchmarks/15
"The 64-core EPYC 9554 2P was 64% faster than the 64-core EPYC 7763 2P configuration overall,
or 67% if running the EPYC 9554 2Ps in the power determinism mode.
(...)The AMD EPYC 9654 2P was running at over 2x the speed of Intel's current flagship, the Xeon Scalable 8380 2P "Ice Lake" processors.
"the generational gains from Milan(X) to Genoa were some of the most captivating generational improvements and against the competition that I've seen out of the past 18+ years of running Phoronix for Linux hardware reviews"
autre tests :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-4th-gen-epyc-genoa-9654-9554-and-9374f-review-96-cores-zen-4-and-5nm-disrupt-the-data-center
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-genoa-gaps-intel-xeon-in-stunning-fashion/
reste à voir face aux nouveaux CPU intel Sapphire Rapids en 60 coeurs
un Htop avec 356 Thread lol ! :
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AMD-EPYC-9654-2P-384-Thread-HTOP-100-percent.jpg
"In a 24x DDR5 server, it is not uncommon to see memory using well over 100W, or ~10% of system power." lol
AMD's EPYC 9004 "Genoa" Reference Board Runs The Open-Source OpenBMC (c'est une solution openSource pour "manager" les serveurs avec des firmwares openSource)
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-genoa-openbmc
AMD Epyc 9004 highlights
N5 at TSMC
Zen 4 architecture
16 to 96 processor cores and 192 threads
12 channel memory interface
Up to 6TB DDR5-4800
128 PCIe lanes Gen5 for single socket
160 PCIe lanes Gen5 for dual socket
64 CLX lanes
+ 14% IPC*
https://www.nextinpact.com/article/70289/amd-annonce-ses-radeon-rx-7900xtx-air-zen-et-zeste-dia-des-899-dollars
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/carte-graphique/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-et-rx-7900-xt-des-cartes-graphiques-70-plus-rapides-dans-les-jeux-n195195.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17638/amd-reveals-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-and-7900-xt-first-rdna-3-parts-to-hit-shelves-in-december
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17635/amd-rdna-3-gpu-unveil-live-blog-1pm-pt-2000-utc
+50 à 70% plus performantes d'après AMD
Les Radeon RX 7900 XTX et Radeon RX 7900 XT seront commercialisées à partir du 13 décembre
aux tarifs respectifs de 999 $ et 899 $.
Des tarifs plus élevés que sur l’ancienne génération,
mais qui les situent nettement en-dessous des GeForce RTX 40 de Nvidia (1199 $ pour la RTX 4080 et 1599 $ pour la RTX 4090)
"Radeon RX 7900 XTX is designed to go against 4080 and we don't have benchmarks numbers on 4080. "(d'après AMD)
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/carte-graphique/amd-annonce-le-fsr-3-hypr-rx-et-le-label-advantage-desktops-n195203.html
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/carte-graphique/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-et-rx-7900-xt-des-cartes-graphiques-70-plus-rapides-dans-les-jeux-n195195.html
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17638/amd-reveals-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-and-7900-xt-first-rdna-3-parts-to-hit-shelves-in-december
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17635/amd-rdna-3-gpu-unveil-live-blog-1pm-pt-2000-utc
+50 à 70% plus performantes d'après AMD
Les Radeon RX 7900 XTX et Radeon RX 7900 XT seront commercialisées à partir du 13 décembre
aux tarifs respectifs de 999 $ et 899 $.
Des tarifs plus élevés que sur l’ancienne génération,
mais qui les situent nettement en-dessous des GeForce RTX 40 de Nvidia (1199 $ pour la RTX 4080 et 1599 $ pour la RTX 4090)
"Radeon RX 7900 XTX is designed to go against 4080 and we don't have benchmarks numbers on 4080. "(d'après AMD)
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/carte-graphique/amd-annonce-le-fsr-3-hypr-rx-et-le-label-advantage-desktops-n195203.html
concaténation de 25 tests :
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/xs88ck/amd_ryzen_7000_meta_review_25_launch_reviews/
ça consomme beaucoup par défaut, mais ça arrache et ça reste plus efficient
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17585/amd-zen-4-ryzen-9-7950x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-review-retaking-the-high-end :
Final Words: Zen 4 is now King, Long Live the King
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/amd-ryzen-7950x-7900x-7700x-7600x-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
The Ryzen 9 7950X is even faster in multi-core applications with a maximum of 88 watts than the Ryzen 9 5950X with 142 watts and with 65 watts even faster than the Core i9-12900K with 241 watts.
With 45 watts, the Ryzen 7 7700X clearly beats the Ryzen 9 6900HS for notebooks, which is trimmed for efficiency and also has 45 watts. This gives hope for extremely efficient, extremely fast Ryzen 7000 Mobile.
In multi-core loads, the 16-zen quad-core processor speeds up and away. Intel's CPUs don't stand a chance, even the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X with 32 Zen 3 cores is just missed
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-7-7700x-gaming-benchmark-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Grace à la fréquence nettement plus élevée, le gap est très intéressant, (clock to clock c'est +12% en multicpu)
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46620-test-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-a-7-7700x-zen-4-am5-x670e-a-ddr5.html
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-realise-un-tour-de-force-brulant-en-5-nm-et-offre-des-cpu-tres-rapides-a192281.html
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-7900x-7950x-linux
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (sans ventirad) : 849.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (sans ventirad) : 669.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (sans ventirad) : 489.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (sans ventirad) : 369.00 €
pour les cartes mères :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83359/cartes-meres-amd-x670-les-tarifs-et-la-disponibilite-en-france.html
ça pique mais il faut attendre les B650
la dif entre chipset :
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-10/chipsaetze-ryzen-7000-amd-x670e-x670-b650e-b650-vergleich/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/xs88ck/amd_ryzen_7000_meta_review_25_launch_reviews/
ça consomme beaucoup par défaut, mais ça arrache et ça reste plus efficient
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17585/amd-zen-4-ryzen-9-7950x-and-ryzen-5-7600x-review-retaking-the-high-end :
Final Words: Zen 4 is now King, Long Live the King
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/amd-ryzen-7950x-7900x-7700x-7600x-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
The Ryzen 9 7950X is even faster in multi-core applications with a maximum of 88 watts than the Ryzen 9 5950X with 142 watts and with 65 watts even faster than the Core i9-12900K with 241 watts.
With 45 watts, the Ryzen 7 7700X clearly beats the Ryzen 9 6900HS for notebooks, which is trimmed for efficiency and also has 45 watts. This gives hope for extremely efficient, extremely fast Ryzen 7000 Mobile.
In multi-core loads, the 16-zen quad-core processor speeds up and away. Intel's CPUs don't stand a chance, even the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X with 32 Zen 3 cores is just missed
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-09/ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-7-7700x-gaming-benchmark-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Grace à la fréquence nettement plus élevée, le gap est très intéressant, (clock to clock c'est +12% en multicpu)
https://www.comptoir-hardware.com/articles/cpu-mobo-ram/46620-test-amd-ryzen-9-7950x-a-7-7700x-zen-4-am5-x670e-a-ddr5.html
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-realise-un-tour-de-force-brulant-en-5-nm-et-offre-des-cpu-tres-rapides-a192281.html
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-ryzen-7900x-7950x-linux
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (sans ventirad) : 849.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (sans ventirad) : 669.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (sans ventirad) : 489.00 €
- AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (sans ventirad) : 369.00 €
pour les cartes mères :
https://www.cowcotland.com/news/83359/cartes-meres-amd-x670-les-tarifs-et-la-disponibilite-en-france.html
ça pique mais il faut attendre les B650
la dif entre chipset :
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2022-10/chipsaetze-ryzen-7000-amd-x670e-x670-b650e-b650-vergleich/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Power setting Power consumption Maximum fan noise
Performance 45 -> 25 Watt 42,8 dB(A)
Intelligent Cooling 32 -> 20 Watt 37,2 dB(A)
Battery Saver 20 -> 12 Watt 31,2 dB(A)
The Lenovo Yoga 7 14 is an extremely powerful convertible with the AMD processor. Moreover, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is currently proving to be the better choice for compact notebooks or convertibles in terms of efficiency and a significantly faster iGPU.
Performance 45 -> 25 Watt 42,8 dB(A)
Intelligent Cooling 32 -> 20 Watt 37,2 dB(A)
Battery Saver 20 -> 12 Watt 31,2 dB(A)
The Lenovo Yoga 7 14 is an extremely powerful convertible with the AMD processor. Moreover, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is currently proving to be the better choice for compact notebooks or convertibles in terms of efficiency and a significantly faster iGPU.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17550/amd-ryzen-7000-live-blog-7pm-et2300-utc
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-passe-la-5e-avec-ses-processeurs-ryzen-7000-hautement-ambitieux-n190369.html
Ryzen 5 7600X : 6C/12T, de 4,7 à 5,3 GHz, 38 Mo de cache, 105 watts de TDP à 299 dollars
Ryzen 5 7700X : 8C/16T, de 4,5 à 5,4 GHz, 40 Mo de cache, 105 watts de TDP à 399 dollars
Ryzen 5 7800X : 12C/24T, de 4,7 à 5,6 GHz, 76 Mo de cache, 170 watts de TDP à 549 dollars
Ryzen 5 7900X : 16C/32T, de 4,5 à 5,7 GHz, 80 Mo de cache, 170 watts de TDP à 699 dollars
https://www.nextinpact.com/article/68549/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-disponibles-27-septembre-des-299-dollars
https://www.lesnumeriques.com/cpu-processeur/amd-passe-la-5e-avec-ses-processeurs-ryzen-7000-hautement-ambitieux-n190369.html
Ryzen 5 7600X : 6C/12T, de 4,7 à 5,3 GHz, 38 Mo de cache, 105 watts de TDP à 299 dollars
Ryzen 5 7700X : 8C/16T, de 4,5 à 5,4 GHz, 40 Mo de cache, 105 watts de TDP à 399 dollars
Ryzen 5 7800X : 12C/24T, de 4,7 à 5,6 GHz, 76 Mo de cache, 170 watts de TDP à 549 dollars
Ryzen 5 7900X : 16C/32T, de 4,5 à 5,7 GHz, 80 Mo de cache, 170 watts de TDP à 699 dollars
https://www.nextinpact.com/article/68549/amd-ryzen-7000-zen-4-disponibles-27-septembre-des-299-dollars
des futurs 3D cache comme le mien ( le 5800X3D) :
https://www.tomshardware.fr/les-ryzen-7000x3d-seraient-jusqua-30-plus-performants-que-les-ryzen-7000/
https://www.tomshardware.fr/les-ryzen-7000x3d-seraient-jusqua-30-plus-performants-que-les-ryzen-7000/