Slides compare the Xeon 6990E+ against AMD EPYC 9965(192c).
The company claims up to 1.3x higher performance per watt at 40% CPU utilization, and also claims 1.3x higher average performance per thread and performance per thread per watt across selected workloads.
These are Intel-provided figures, so independent testing will be needed for the full comparison.
à voir en pratique,
mais Intel semble revenir
Depuis la mi-avril 2026, il est possible de mettre à niveau un serveur sous Windows Server 2019 ou 2022 vers Windows Server 2025 via Windows Update
bien ! enfin
(en gros de toute façon Windows serveur est basé sur Windows10/11)
format compact intéressant
N150
mais chauffe un peu
16 voir 32Go de RAM
2 SSD M.2
2 Ethernet (mais 1Gbit)
testé récemment ici :
https://www.phoronix.com/review/zimaboard2
the AMD EPYC 9745 was delivering about 90% the performance of its 128 core EPYC 9755 sibling. Considering that the EPYC 9745 has just 80% the TDP rating of the EPYC 9755, that's a nice showing for the EPYC 9745 with its dense cores. When pulling back to the 320 Watt lowest cTDP, it was around 98% the performance of the 400 Watt default.
Across the mix of different workloads tested, the EPYC 9745 consumed 73% the power of the EPYC 9755 across the mix of workloads tested. The peak CPU power was at 379 Watts for the EPYC 9745 compared to 497 Watts with the EPYC 9755. With the 320 Watt cTDP power configuration was the additional power savings.
And lastly the system DC power consumption as reported by the Corsair HX1500i power supply used for this Gigabyte server.
Overall the AMD EPYC 9745 offered good performance relative to the EPYC 9755 with its full Zen 5 cores and higher TDP while offering quite a nice lead in performance-per-Watt across the many workloads tested. The EPYC 9745 is a great choice for those concerned about maximizing the power efficiency of your EPYC 9005 series server build and/or limited to a maximum 400 Watt TDP rated processors by your server platform.
Intéressant, le Zen 5c reste pas mal
au boulot on a un hyperviseur Proxmox avec un Epyc 128 cœurs Zen 4c
When taking the geometric mean of the nearly 500 benchmarks in total, the AMD EPYC 9755 2P delivered 1.45x the performance of the Xeon 6980P 2P server.
With the same 128 cores / 256 threads per socket for those Turin and Granite Rapids processors,
the 5th Gen AMD EPYC performance continues to demonstrate decisive performance leadership.
quand on regarde l'intel n'est qu'à 3.2Ghz sur tous les coeurs contre 4.1Ghz en turbo (cas faible charge)
Microsoft justifie ces bonifications de manière assez simple. La prise en charge native des périphériques NVMe permet de s’affranchir du traitement des E/S basé sur SCSI (Small Computer System Interface),
vraiment à la rue Microsoft ....
ça fait des lustres que les NVMe existent ...
The 96-core variant has a 2.2 GHz base clock and 3.0 GHz boost clock
Et voila la Chine via bientôt sortir un gros CPU (il y avait eu une joint venture avec AMD par le passé)
Windows Server Hotpatching pour tous
Active Directory et SMB de nouvelle génération
Données et stockage critiques
Hyper-V et IA
Microsoft rattrape un peu son retard sur Vmware
même le N2 en 4+1 est pas mal
rumeur de CPU intel Serveur de 80c puis même 120 coeurs ?
sous système Linux sur Windows Server 2022
Windows Server 2022 Standard reports as Build 20348 ("21H2") with the familiar Windows 10 desktop - including tiles in the start menu.
The enterprise operating system has been assigned new roles in the future, as it comes with an extended feature set.
DNS-over-HTTPS for DNS resolution
AES-256-GCM / CCM encryption for SMB
Nested virtualization on current processors from the AMD Epyc and Intel Xeon product series
Hyper-V platform in virtual machines
Improved Kubernetes for Azure
Extended container functions
In addition, the Chromium-based Edge completely replaces Internet Explorer and the "old" Edge browser based on the proprietary HTML renderer EdgeHTML in the enterprise sector for the first time .