At 45W, the multi-threaded performance of the chip is well sustainable and reasonable for this kind of device form-factor and cooling solution, but here it needs to be put into context,
particularly against the nearest competition,
which is AMD’s Ryzen 9 5980HS. In our benchmarks, both the Core i9-11980HK and the Ryzen 9 5980HS battle it out, sometimes with the Intel chip coming ahead, sometimes with the AMD chip leading the results.
The issue with this comparison though is that we’re comparing a 45W chip(intel) vs a 35W chip(amd),
and more often in compute heavy workloads such as rendering or encoding, the AMD chip comes ahead even though it has a lower TDP.
https://www.tomshardware.com/features/intel-tiger-lake-h-11th-gen-benchmarks-8-core
les slides :
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-launches-eight-core-tiger-lake-h-processors-more-power-lower-clocks
Devant les cpu mobile d'AMD d'après intel.
et voici les test de notebookcheck d'un prototype sur cinebench (grosso modo au niveau) :
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Tiger-Lake-H-now-official-first-benchmarks-indicate-Intel-finally-closing-the-multithread-performance-gap-with-AMD-Ryzen-5000.537971.0.html
tous les tests
https://videocardz.com/107476/intel-11th-gen-core-rocket-lake-s-review-roundup
la dernière gen de CPU intel qui passe de 10 à 8coeurs, c'est pas fou, et c'est loin de rattraper AMD (sauf en single thread)
La conso est très élevée,
et la chauffe plutôt élevée.
Intel claims up to 20% single-thread performance uplift with its new Golden Cove core design. We are not sure if the baseline for this claim is Rocket Lake or Tiger Lake though
(arrivée fin d'année)
The processors are manufactured with the company’s 10nm process, and are said to deliver up to 35% better overall application performance
and up to 78% better graphics performance compared to Gemini Lake Refresh processors.
intel en train de se faire manger par les Soc ARM chez Amazon, et ça ne sera peut être pas le dernier ...