144 coeurs ! ("basse conso" donc du Atom très amélioré) :
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-roadmap-update-includes-144-core-sierra-forest-clearwater-forest-in-2025
rumeur de CPU intel Serveur de 80c puis même 120 coeurs ?
au niveau du CPU Snapdragon 8(+) Gen 1
voila c'est celui la qu'il faut
Ah ...
Initial Verdict: AMD has the best mobile processor
https://www.tomshardware.fr/test-processeur-amd-ryzen-7950-x3d-gaming-jeux-cpu/
"Avec son Ryzen 9 7950X3D, AMD parvient à reprendre la place de processeur le plus puissant en jeu, coiffant sur le poteau un Core i9-13900K pourtant déjà très bon.
Intel possède bien un 13900KS plus rapide (...] : vendu plusieurs dizaines d’euros plus cher que le 7950X3D, il reste légèrement moins performant que ce dernier. "
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-02/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is not only very fast, but also very energy efficient. What the Ryzen 9 7950X still needed an average of 105 watts for in the test, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D only needs 72 watts - with better performance at the same time. The Core i9-13900K even has 141 watts, the KS model 147 watts. Here the new AMD processor delivers twice as many FPS per watt - that's impressive
le 8coeurs a été simulé (avec CCD désactivé) et il est encore plus efficace :
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/ryzen-7800x3d-performance-preview/
ça serait excellent et il reprendrait le lead en jeu
For the past year, DigiTimes Research has awarded
Intel a 77 percent share, which is almost 8 percentage points less than 2021.
In return, AMD has climbed from 11.2 percent to 15.6 percent
and ARM has almost doubled its share with 6.8 percent instead of the previous 3.5 percent.
à suivre
"But AMD has not said the final word yet, as the company is also preparing a 16-core Ryzen 9 7945HX processor, which is likely to narrow the gap even further."
Intel Core i9-13980HX: 4566 ST (114.0%), 54483 MT (116%)
Intel Core i9-13980HX: 4375 ST (109.3%), 51739 MT (111%)
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX: 4003 ST (100.0%), 46791 MT (100%)
Intel Core i9-12900HX: 3986 ST (99.6%), 35730 MT (76%)
La confrontation tourne à l’avantage du processeur d’AMD
Pas beaucoup moins perf
ça consomme pas beaucoup moins non plus
mais c'est moins cher
https://videocardz.com/147338/amd-ryzen-7900-7700-7600-non-x-desktop-cpu-review-roundup
Intel is also claiming double-digit performance gains with the latest quad-core Intel Inside N200 processor compared to the previous series,
with 28% better overall application performance and up to 28% gains in web browsing performance
et des performances graphiques jusqu'à 64 % supérieures sur le processeur Intel par rapport à la génération précédente
codec av1
à priori gain assez important en perspective
4 à 8 coeurs
jusqu'à (8+16) sur les HX et 157w en turbo !!! (55w de base)
jusqu'à 10 coeurs sur les modèles U (2+8/12 thread)
(8+16 coeurs)
- Ryzen 9 7950X - 699 dollars à 574 dollars dont - 18%
- Ryzen 9 7900X - 549 dollars à 474 dollars dont - 14%
- Ryzen 7 7700X - 399 dollars à 349 dollars dont - 13%
- Ryzen 5 7600X - 299 dollars à 249 dollars dont - 17%
déjà des baisses
présentation :
https://www.tomshardware.fr/amd-devoile-ses-processeurs-epyc-9004-jusqua-96-coeurs-zen-4/
performance dingue de la nouvelle plateforme serveur d'AMD en 96coeurs :
"https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9654-9554-benchmarks/15
"The 64-core EPYC 9554 2P was 64% faster than the 64-core EPYC 7763 2P configuration overall,
or 67% if running the EPYC 9554 2Ps in the power determinism mode.
(...)The AMD EPYC 9654 2P was running at over 2x the speed of Intel's current flagship, the Xeon Scalable 8380 2P "Ice Lake" processors.
"the generational gains from Milan(X) to Genoa were some of the most captivating generational improvements and against the competition that I've seen out of the past 18+ years of running Phoronix for Linux hardware reviews"
autre tests :
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-4th-gen-epyc-genoa-9654-9554-and-9374f-review-96-cores-zen-4-and-5nm-disrupt-the-data-center
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-epyc-genoa-gaps-intel-xeon-in-stunning-fashion/
reste à voir face aux nouveaux CPU intel Sapphire Rapids en 60 coeurs
un Htop avec 356 Thread lol ! :
https://www.servethehome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AMD-EPYC-9654-2P-384-Thread-HTOP-100-percent.jpg
"In a 24x DDR5 server, it is not uncommon to see memory using well over 100W, or ~10% of system power." lol
AMD's EPYC 9004 "Genoa" Reference Board Runs The Open-Source OpenBMC (c'est une solution openSource pour "manager" les serveurs avec des firmwares openSource)
https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-genoa-openbmc
AMD Epyc 9004 highlights
N5 at TSMC
Zen 4 architecture
16 to 96 processor cores and 192 threads
12 channel memory interface
Up to 6TB DDR5-4800
128 PCIe lanes Gen5 for single socket
160 PCIe lanes Gen5 for dual socket
64 CLX lanes
- 14% IPC*