plutôt performant,
En applicatif, single core c'est le plus perf, en multicœur l'AMD 5950X garde l'avantage
le 12900K est le meilleur en jeu (+10%)
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2021-11/intel-core-i9-12900k-i7-12700k-i5-12600k-gaming-benchmark-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=nui
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2021-11/intel-core-i9-12900k-i7-12700k-i5-12600k-test/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=nui
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-12900k-alder-lake-12th-gen/
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel-12600k-12900k&num=1
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-z690-alder-lake-motherboard-comparison-buying-guide/
https://www.inpact-hardware.com/article/2744/intel-officialise-ses-core-12e-generation-lga-1700-des-264-dollars
https://www.inpact-hardware.com/article/2753/intel-core-12e-generation-cartes-meres-z690-ddr5-prix-et-disponibilite
I’m not a big one on posting first-party benchmark results, but the high-level overview from Intel was this:
At 3.3 GHz, 12900K is +19% better in Single Thread Performance over the 11900K
Over the 11900K, the 12900K is +19% better at 1080p High with RTX 3090
Over the 11900K, the 12900K gets +84% better fps when concurrently streaming
Over the 11900K, the 12900K is +22-100% better in content creation (Adobe)
Over the 11900K, the 12900K is +50% faster in BlenderMT at 241W (vs 250W)
Over the 11900K, the 12900K performs the same in BlenderMT at only 65W (vs 250W)
https://www.anandtech.com/show/16959/intel-innovation-alder-lake-november-4th
The test will be on November 4th
il s’agit d’un Cortex-M0 32 bits
La solution embarquera 128 bytes de RAM
et 456 bytes de ROM
https://www.lenovo.com/fr/fr/laptops/thinkpad/l-series/L14-AMD-G2/p/22TPL14L4A2
test du 15" en 5600u(zen3) :
https://www.notebookcheck.biz/Test-du-Lenovo-ThinkPad-L15-Gen-2-un-PC-portable-AMD-convaincant-a-moins-de-1-000-euros.552603.0.html
il faudrait le 5850u (8coeurs Zen3) https://lenovocampus.metacomp.de/Shop-EN/product-3999_3973796/lenovo-thinkpad-l15-gen-2-20x7-ryzen-7-pro-5850u-1-9-ghz
At 45W, the multi-threaded performance of the chip is well sustainable and reasonable for this kind of device form-factor and cooling solution, but here it needs to be put into context,
particularly against the nearest competition,
which is AMD’s Ryzen 9 5980HS. In our benchmarks, both the Core i9-11980HK and the Ryzen 9 5980HS battle it out, sometimes with the Intel chip coming ahead, sometimes with the AMD chip leading the results.
The issue with this comparison though is that we’re comparing a 45W chip(intel) vs a 35W chip(amd),
and more often in compute heavy workloads such as rendering or encoding, the AMD chip comes ahead even though it has a lower TDP.
https://www.tomshardware.com/features/intel-tiger-lake-h-11th-gen-benchmarks-8-core
les slides :
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-launches-eight-core-tiger-lake-h-processors-more-power-lower-clocks
Devant les cpu mobile d'AMD d'après intel.
et voici les test de notebookcheck d'un prototype sur cinebench (grosso modo au niveau) :
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Tiger-Lake-H-now-official-first-benchmarks-indicate-Intel-finally-closing-the-multithread-performance-gap-with-AMD-Ryzen-5000.537971.0.html
un système de lock ... limité à une marque
The CPU performance of Armv9 SoC is expected to increase by more than 30% over the next two generations of mobile and infrastructure CPUs,
tous les tests
https://videocardz.com/107476/intel-11th-gen-core-rocket-lake-s-review-roundup
la dernière gen de CPU intel qui passe de 10 à 8coeurs, c'est pas fou, et c'est loin de rattraper AMD (sauf en single thread)
La conso est très élevée,
et la chauffe plutôt élevée.
Intel claims up to 20% single-thread performance uplift with its new Golden Cove core design. We are not sure if the baseline for this claim is Rocket Lake or Tiger Lake though